Strategic Vs. Financial Buying/Selling of a Custom Coater
Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2016
Custom powder coaters face two
primary alternatives when considering
the sale of their business
to third parties: the sale of 100 percent
of their business to a strategic buyer
or the sale of 60 to 80 percent of their
business to a private equity firm. This
decision can be complex. Thus, before
beginning the process of selling, owners
should gain in-depth knowledge of the
value these business relationships can
offer and whether a strategic purchaser or
a financial partner is a better option.
First, know how each type of buyer
operates and which one will enable your
business to meet its objectives. Let’s examine
the options:
- Strategic buyers are companies already
in similar lines of business and which
are focused on enhancing their existing
business model and the financial return
to their shareholders from the purchase
of another company. Strategic buyers
may also include the portfolio companies
of private equity firms that are
functioning as acquisition platforms. A
strategic buyer may be upstream in the
custom powder coaters supply chain
(manufacturers of powder coating
equipment, powder, and other consumable
supplies), downstream (metal
fabricators with in-house or outsourced
powder coating), or metal finishing
companies that provide competitive or
complementary finishing services (other
custom powder coaters, galvanizers,
painters, platers, etc.).
- Private equity firms are companies
that may have experience in the same
or similar supply chain, but are not
currently in the same line of business
of the target company. Their primary
focus will be looking at the company as
a standalone investment with the potential
for internal growth of revenue,
earnings, and free cash flow. A secondary
focus will be on achieving external
growth by converting the company into
an acquisition platform.
In many private companies, the
owners’ objectives may diverge from one
another. Reconciling those differences
is critical to a successful relationship
with any buyer. What are the financial
and ownership objectives of prospective
buyers? How do these compare to the
owners’ definition of success? Aligning or
reconciling these objectives is imperative.
Performing due diligence on prospective
buyers is every bit as important as
the buy-side due diligence on the target
company. In any transaction, there will
inevitably be organizational changes and
dislocations that occur post-closing. The
owners should have a planning team
created to identify and develop solutions
to these issues, along with the buyer.
Strategic buyers are often ready to
pay top dollar for an acquisition. Several
factors are involved, including the potential
to realize operating synergies and
their willingness to receive lower returns
on investment (ROI) than private equity
firms. Strategic buyers may also offer a
higher price in exchange for their stock,
but that comes with both upside potential
and downside risk. Private equity firms
typically offer a lower initial purchase
price, but with the prospect of higher,
long-term gain based upon the future sale
of any retained ownership.
While strategic buyers will usually
acquire 100 percent of the target company
for cash or some combination of cash
and stock, private equity firms are able
to offer all cash deal structures with the
flexibility to meet the divergent needs of
the ownership group.
One of the most important issues
in deal structuring is financial leverage.
Private equity firms tend to use higher
levels of debt in the capital structure of
acquisitions than strategic buyers. The
effect may sometimes be to over-leverage
a business, thereby reducing the reinvestment
of operating cash flow into the business to fund growth. Owners must
analyze the debt load in comparison to
projected operating cash flows to realistically
assess whether the capital structure
fulfills operating requirements.
The strategic buyer’s industry expertise
can often reduce the length and
complexity of the due diligence process.
Since financial buyers frequently do not
have the same industry expertise, they
may bring in consultants to perform part
of the due diligence, thus drawing out
diligence and delaying closing. Regardless
of the type of buyer, it is still important
that owners educate prospective buyers
on the numerous benefits of powder
coating, including its efficacy as a coating
medium, its environmental superiority to
other finishing techniques, and the custom
design capability of powder coating
finishes.
Owners should carefully review the
investment criteria of prospective buyers,
particularly private equity firms. Is this
transaction consistent with their stated
industry preferences and experience?
Will they be able to add value based upon
previous experience? Is this transaction
consistent with their stated target company
size? Is the proposed transaction
structure similar to previous transactions
in their portfolio? Is the proposed
transaction consistent with previous
transactions, e.g., if the buyer specializes
in acquiring businesses with solid fundamentals,
what are the implications if this
transaction is a turn around? Does the
private equity firm have sufficient “dry
powder” to make incremental investments
in the business, as needed? Previous
acquisitions made by the firm will
also indicate its strength in the follow-on
investment stage.
The owners of a custom coater need
a realistic assessment of what actually
happened with the PE firm’s prior transactions.
Every transaction includes a lot of “happy talk.” The objective is to get a
complete picture, which is only achievable
through careful due diligence and
analysis. Uncovering issues with disruptive
potential before the transaction closes
is the paramount objective of this process.
Aligning strategies and visions may be
one of the most important criteria in selecting
between strategic buyers or private
equity firms. Despite the fact that strategic
buyers, unlike some financial buyers, will
already have their own plans, the company
is tasked with clearly explaining its
vision and strategy for success.
Minimizing workforce disruption and
maintaining the culture of the business
will most likely be achieved through a
partnership with a private equity firm,
as strategic buyers will look to obtain
synergies by streamlining operations
through reductions in staff and management.
That’s not to say private
equity firms are not also committed to
operational efficiency, but there is more
opportunity for the target company’s
management to remain intact, taking a
strong leadership role in the new
organization.
Good strategic buyers understand
the importance of figuring out the
essential cultural attributes that originally
led to profitability and innovation
in the acquired company, with the goal
of preserving those essentials after the
purchase. Cultural or legacy attributes
that inhibit integration and operational
improvement will be quickly eliminated.
Private equity firms will have a greater
tendency to maintain the culture of acquired
companies and preserve the legacy
of the business.
The seller is in the position to make
many of the initial decisions that will
determine how the relationship proceeds.
Strong negotiating skills and a willingness
to compromise will be key during this
stage.
It’s in the best interest of the buyers to
tell sellers and management that they are
a partner in achieving long-term financial
and operating objectives. They promise to
work on strategic decisions together and
to let management run day-to-day operations.
Normally, those are true statements,
but due diligence will reveal the extent to
which that will remain true post-closing.
Management should be prepared for
the somewhat laborious phase following
closing, when the focus is on achieving
operational excellence and organic (or
internal) growth. Growth through acquisition
will only occur after the platform
company achieves operational excellence.
History has shown that the leading
exit strategy for a private equity firm is to
sell to a strategic buyer. The second leading
strategy is to sell to another private
equity firm focused on larger companies.
Therefore, even if the first transaction
is completed with a financial buyer, the
target company and the managers with
retained equity interests are more likely
than not going to sell their ownership in
a subsequent transaction to a strategic
buyer.
John D. (Jack) Kearney Sr. is the managing
director of investment banking at Dumas
Capital Partners, LLC in Dallas/Fort Worth. He
specializes in providing corporate finance services
to middle-market companies and can be
reached at jackkearney@DumasPartners.com.